Usefull to test the PRECIS / JID enforcement implementation of XMPP services. Advantages over xep328: base64 encoded string possible. No jid-malformed error IQ response in case the stanza is not valid. This makes it impossible to distinguish from e.g. a malformed jid in 'to'. Parts are returned split.
If supported, service announces 'urn:xmpp:jid-validate:0' feature.
<iq type='get'
from='user@example.org/resource'
to='example.org'
id='request1'>
<jid-validate-request xmlns='urn:xmpp:jid-validate:0'>
<maybe-jid>Σ@example.com/resource</maybe-jid>
</jid-validate-request>
</iq>If the JID is valid, then a <jid-validate-result/> with a <valid-jid/> child element is returned. The valid-jid element MUST contain 'domainpart' and may contain 'localpart' and/or 'resourcepart' elements. If the JID does not contain a local- or resourcepart, then the element is omitted.
<iq type='result'
from='example.org'
to='user@example.org/resource'
id='request1'>
<jid-validate-result xmlns='urn:xmpp:jid-validate:0'>
<valid-jid>
<localpart>σ</localpart>
<domainpart>example.com</domainpart>
<resourcepart>resource</resourcepart>
<valid-jid>
</jid-validate-result>
</iq>
<iq type='get'
from='user@example.org/resource'
to='example.org'
id='request2'>
<jid-validate-request xmlns='urn:xmpp:jid-validate:0'>
<maybe-jid>henryⅣ@example.com</maybe-jid>
</jid-validate-request>
</iq>
<iq type='result'
from='example.org'
to='user@example.org/resource'
id='request2'>
<jid-validate-result xmlns='urn:xmpp:jid-validate:0'>
<invalid-jid>
<reason>Invalid codepoint 'Ⅳ' in localpart.</reason>
</invalid-jid>
</jid-validate-result>
</iq>If supported, service announces 'urn:xmpp:jid-validate:base64:0' feature. Responses as above.
<iq type='get'
from='user@example.org/resource'
to='example.org'
id='request1'>
<jid-validate-base64-request xmlns='urn:xmpp:jid-validate:0'>
<base64-maybe-jid>zqNAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20vcmVzb3VyY2U=</base64-maybe-jid>
</jid-validate-base64-request>
</iq>TODO: Consider restricting access to service, e.g. to local or admin users only, or rate limit it.
REQUIRED.
REQUIRED.
REQUIRED for protocol specifications.
This document in other formats: XML PDF
This XMPP Extension Protocol is copyright © 1999 – 2020 by the XMPP Standards Foundation (XSF).
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this specification (the "Specification"), to make use of the Specification without restriction, including without limitation the rights to implement the Specification in a software program, deploy the Specification in a network service, and copy, modify, merge, publish, translate, distribute, sublicense, or sell copies of the Specification, and to permit persons to whom the Specification is furnished to do so, subject to the condition that the foregoing copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Specification. Unless separate permission is granted, modified works that are redistributed shall not contain misleading information regarding the authors, title, number, or publisher of the Specification, and shall not claim endorsement of the modified works by the authors, any organization or project to which the authors belong, or the XMPP Standards Foundation.
## NOTE WELL: This Specification is provided on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ##
In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall the XMPP Standards Foundation or any author of this Specification be liable for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising from, out of, or in connection with the Specification or the implementation, deployment, or other use of the Specification (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if the XMPP Standards Foundation or such author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
This XMPP Extension Protocol has been contributed in full conformance with the XSF's Intellectual Property Rights Policy (a copy of which can be found at <https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/ipr-policy> or obtained by writing to XMPP Standards Foundation, P.O. Box 787, Parker, CO 80134 USA).
The HTML representation (you are looking at) is maintained by the XSF. It is based on the YAML CSS Framework, which is licensed under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 2.0 license.
The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is defined in the XMPP Core (RFC 6120) and XMPP IM (RFC 6121) specifications contributed by the XMPP Standards Foundation to the Internet Standards Process, which is managed by the Internet Engineering Task Force in accordance with RFC 2026. Any protocol defined in this document has been developed outside the Internet Standards Process and is to be understood as an extension to XMPP rather than as an evolution, development, or modification of XMPP itself.
The primary venue for discussion of XMPP Extension Protocols is the <standards@xmpp.org> discussion list.
Discussion on other xmpp.org discussion lists might also be appropriate; see <http://xmpp.org/about/discuss.shtml> for a complete list.
Errata can be sent to <editor@xmpp.org>.
The following requirements keywords as used in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119: "MUST", "SHALL", "REQUIRED"; "MUST NOT", "SHALL NOT"; "SHOULD", "RECOMMENDED"; "SHOULD NOT", "NOT RECOMMENDED"; "MAY", "OPTIONAL".
Note: Older versions of this specification might be available at http://xmpp.org/extensions/attic/
First draft.
END